Thursday, June 4, 2009

Possibilities

We can't undo anything we've done. We can make amends and express regrets, but done is done.

If you could go back in time, would you be able to undo? Would you want to? You don't know how you'd affect the future, as a myriad of trite movies and TV shows illustrate. Does the question matter? If we are ever able to travel back in time, the travelers must be with us now, in their past. Maybe the travelers are so clever we can't detect them. Or maybe they can only travel to a point in their own lives without knowledge of the future, which is equivalent to doing nothing. I'll assume that such travel is nonexistent or its equivalent, at least for our universe.

When the universe came into being (by whatever means you choose to believe), so did time, for time has no meaning without existence. We wind our threads forward through time. We can remember the past, revel in it, regret it, wax nostalgic, and reinvent it in our minds though not in reality. The past is set, but the future appears to be nebulous, becoming the past as we move in the present.

Because we can't travel to the past we assume that it is gone... nonexistent. We can't travel to a distant star system, but it exists. We live our individual lives in a brief, finite thread of time. We only experience the present, a speck on the thread, but the thread exists in the context of the immense, though finite, fabric of space-time. Our threads would be insignificant to anyone who could view the entire fabric, but they're significant to us.

Why should we only have one thread? Because the moment we diverge from one thread to create a new one, we are different people living in a different universe from that of the other thread. Our abilities, aspirations, environment, memories and a host of other factors define us. We're part of the universe and what we do defines it at a microscopic level.

So one thread per customer per universe. How many universes? Our universe has always existed in the sense that "always" only has meaning where there is time. But the discontinuity at the time origin for the fabric gives us an "absolute zero" for time, an epoch. We can imagine a time before that, though it remains imaginary.

Existence of one universe implies that others must exist - probability and improbability of something ever occurring mean nothing outside of time (which defines "ever"). We can think of them as parallel universes, but since each has its own time axis, it's just a convenience. They could as well be serial universes. Since any universe cannot, by definition, detect or affect another, we are free to choose whatever constructs our feeble brains need to comprehend a small bit of the immensity.

If we could step outside of space-time and see our huge but finite universe in all its glory, we could see the minute threads of our lives. But this doesn't mean our futures are cast. For there are other universes, similar but not duplicates (and there may indeed be duplicates but they converge to the same for practical purposes). The futures are different in them. Indeed, so is the past in many of them. "We" exist in only one universe, but we also have a huge number of analogs that, if we could see them, we would identify as "us". There is no reason to require that all space-planes along the time-axis of multiple universes be unique. "Now" has many intersections.

The cosmic view may be of no comfort, or it may be of great comfort. What we believe doesn't really matter. Truth matters. And faith is not truth.

5 comments:

  1. Soren,

    The first part of your post reminds me of a quatrain from _The Rubaiyat_:

    Quatrain LI
    The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
    Moves on; nor all thy Piety nor Wit
    Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
    Nor all thy Tears was out a Word of it.


    The multiple universes theory is a fascinating one. It suggests that all possibilities are worked out somewhere. I remember reading several stories in which the multiple universes were tied in with time travel, especially travel into the past. A time traveler never really makes any changes in his universe. His actions create a new universe, and he inhabits that one, leaving his previous one behind.

    What happened "before" the Big Bang or Great Expansion? I guess the cosmologists are still debating that one. The only ones who really "know" all the answers are the creationists, I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, there are several forms of multiple universe theory. One in current fashion is tied in with quantum mechanics. What it comes down to is that anything with more than a zero probability is certain to happen given an unlimited number of tries. But and event that's dependent on certain conditions has its probability affected by events that bring about the conditions.

    The quotes in your last paragraph contain the answer: Undefined ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Soren,

    Not familiar with the theory you mention. I'm familiar with the one that suggests a another universe appears at every decision point. For example, responding to your comment. This is a decision point--in one universe I responded and in a second, I didn't.

    I don't see how probabilities of answering or not answering could play a role here.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My making a comment was a precondition to you either responding to it or not. Had I not commented, the probability that you'd respond to it would be zero. Which is different than the probability that you'd make another comment.

    Having a universe 'appear' at any particular decision point would look the same as two identical universes that diverge at that point in time.

    Even this short example shows how quickly the universes would multiply and quickly becomes so huge we can only begin to grasp it in abstract.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Soren,

    Ok, gotcha.

    We were looking at different aspects. You were looking at a probability rating in a causal chain while I was considering a one time yes-no situation.

    Now--I have responded. You may or may not respond to this, but the chances that you respond are greater now than if I had not responded to your last message.

    However, even though the probability of a response is strong, you still may choose to not respond.

    ReplyDelete